All articles

Proposal Clarity: How to Present Complex Pricing Bundles

Taru Bhargava|Updated Sep 2, 2025

Back in the day, when I first started out as a content strategist, clients came to me for everything (think: SEO, messaging, positioning, sales enablement). I thought the best way to show value was to bundle it all together (one neat package, one price).

But instead of clarity, I created confusion. Clients didn’t know what they were really buying, which parts mattered most, or how to compare me against alternatives.

For me, it was a small stumble. For a SaaS company chasing $10M ARR and above, that same mistake is a serious growth risk. It’s because when your pricing gets more complex, your proposals have to get simpler, or you’ll lose the deal before the conversation even starts.

We’ll unpack ​​why bundled pricing derails proposals, and how the right clarity can shorten cycles, boost adoption, and help you win more deals.

Why bundle and platform pricing is a clarity killer

When the giants trip over bundle clarity — Adobe with Creative Cloud, HubSpot with CRM bundles, Salesforce with multi-cloud — what chance do the rest of us have if we don’t change the way we propose? And if buyers struggle to make sense of their offers, how confident do you think they are when yours lands in their inbox?

The truth is, bundled and platform pricing doesn’t just make life complicated for finance or product teams, but it breaks down at the proposal stage. Instead of making the value obvious, it often clouds the picture.

Here’s why:

Cognitive overload: too many choices stall decisions

When proposals list dozens of SKUs or feature sets, buyers hit analysis paralysis. Instead of focusing on the business case, they’re stuck comparing line items. Psychologist Barry Schwartz, who popularised this idea in his book The Paradox of Choice, found that too many options don’t empower people, but paralyze them.

In one of his most-cited studies, shoppers faced with 24 varieties of jam were 10 times less likely to buy than those given only six.

As Schwartz put it: “Choice overload can make people question the decisions they make before they even make them.” In sales, that questioning shows up as longer deal cycles, more internal debates, and the all-too-familiar brush-off: “Let’s revisit this next quarter.”

Loss of perceived value: bundles start to look overpriced

Line-item pricing invites cherry-picking. A buyer scanning through a long SKU list inevitably thinks, “Do I really need this? Couldn’t we cut that?” Piece by piece, they mentally discount your offering. The irony is that the bundle is designed to deliver greater value together, but the way it’s presented makes it feel inflated.

This isn’t just theory. Research by Simon-Kucher & Partners, a global pricing consultancy, shows that poorly structured bundles can reduce willingness to pay by 20–30%, as buyers undervalue what they don’t fully understand. Instead of seeing the whole Lego castle, they only see a pile of bricks with price tags.

Misaligned narrative: features vs. outcomes

Complex pricing often tempts sales teams into cataloguing features. Buyers, however, don’t want a technical inventory. What they want is a clear link to outcomes: reduced churn, faster onboarding, and higher productivity. Without that link, proposals fail to resonate, and internal champions can’t make the case to their stakeholders.

Gartner’s B2B buyer research highlights this gap: 77% of B2B buyers described their last purchase as “very complex or difficult.” One of the top reasons? A disconnect between what sellers presented and what buyers actually needed to achieve. When the proposal leads with detail instead of results, the story gets lost — and so does the deal.

From SKU chaos to sales clarity

We’ve diagnosed the problem. Now let’s tackle the fix: how do SaaS leaders turn complex pricing into clarity that actually closes deals? The answer isn’t in stacking more SKUs or discounting harder. It’s about reframing pricing as value and translating that value cleanly into proposals.

Pricing is the exchange rate on value

In 2020, Patrick Campbell of ProfitWell and GOAT in the SaaS pricing scene put it this way: “Your price is the exchange rate on the value you’re creating in the world.”

However, pricing has evolved since he first made this statement. In the video below, Madhavan Ramanujam, Senior Partner at Simon-Kucher and the author of the pricing strategy book Monetizing Innovation, argues that pricing is no longer a static number, but a process of value discovery.

Companies that treat pricing as a growth lever constantly revisit packaging and monetization, experimenting until the price matches the value the customer perceives.

Naomi Ionita echoes the sentiment “Pricing is the most under-utilised growth lever in SaaS.” She points out that it’s not a finance exercise; it’s a customer understanding exercise. The better you map your price to what buyers value, the faster you grow.

And here’s the kicker: all that work collapses in the final mile if your proposal doesn’t communicate that exchange of value clearly.

Before: the proposal is a SKU-stuffed spreadsheet. The buyer sees costs and line items, not value.

After: the proposal shows the “exchange rate” — a bundle framed around outcomes like faster onboarding or lower churn, with price anchored to impact.

Sell the solution, not the parts

Sales strategist Bill Wilson says it bluntly: “Nobody buys features. They buy what those features add up to.”

That advice matters even more in SaaS bundles and platforms, where the temptation is to “prove” price by listing every feature. Wilson warns this backfires — buyers mentally disassemble the bundle, cherry-pick, and discount the whole.

Naomi Ionita frames it as storytelling: “Pricing is about the story you’re telling about your product’s value.” If the story is a catalogue, you’ll lose them. If the story is an outcome, they’ll buy in.

Before: proposals break down bundles into parts, inviting cherry-picking.

After: the proposal narrative sells the solution as one coherent outcome. Features are still accessible, but they’re supporting detail, not the headline.


Modern proposal tools, such as Qwilr, make this shift practical. Interactive layouts keep details available, but the default view focuses on outcomes. The story lands first; the SKU list never hijacks the conversation. Bundles only work if buyers see the holistic value

Patrick Campbell and pricing strategist Madhavan emphasize that bundles can dramatically reduce churn and encourage expansion, but only when buyers clearly understand the value. When the story isn’t told well, these bundles backfire.

Take New Relic, for example. Once weighed down by 13+ SKUs and complex per-host pricing, they hit a growth wall—stocks fell 29% in a single day. In 2020, they pivoted to a unified, usage-based model as New Relic One, shedding confusion and unlocking adoption growth.

The same principle showed up at Fuse Recruitment. Their “bundle” wasn’t a mix of SKUs but a combination of services and expertise, yet proposals still failed to fully convey the complete value.

“We didn’t have a document that was cohesive, and explained all the benefits of Fuse. Nor could it be tailored to the industry our client was in. It was a real missed opportunity.”

Nicole Hart, Marketing Manager

With Qwilr, Fuse shifted from static PDFs to personalized, outcome-led proposals that framed the whole package clearly. The result? Their best sales quarter ever, with proposals driving more second meetings and faster conversations.

Before: Disconnected list of services, unclear value.

After: Complete solution, tailored to each client, ROI front and centre.

Five ways to make bundle pricing irresistible in proposals

We’ve already uncovered the problem. Complex bundles often collapse at the proposal stage. This is the moment when buyers decide whether they understand your value or they walk away confused.

So what actually works? How do the best sales teams keep buyers focused on outcomes instead of line items? And how do they make bundle pricing feel like an easy yes rather than a puzzle to solve?

Based on what we’ve seen across thousands of proposals, here are five tactics that consistently turn complexity into clarity and confusion into closed deals.

Lead with outcomes, not inventory

In The Death of Static Proposals we found that static PDFs are often long, generic, and unclear. Instead of helping buyers make decisions, they bury the story under details and leave too much work for the internal champion. 

The best-performing teams take a different approach. They build interactive proposals that surface ROI and value first, while keeping details accessible when the buyer needs them.

With Qwilr, you can structure proposals in the same way. This does not mean the first page should be a financial model. It simply means the early sections should give buyers a clear, outcome-led summary of why the bundle matters, while SKU-level details sit further down in collapsible sections. The buyer sees the story first and can still drill into specifics when they are ready.

Offer tiered choices

When buyers are confronted with too many options, deals stall and choice paralysis sets in, and nobody moves forward. But structuring choices thoughtfully accelerates decisions.

Here’s what works: a simple two- or three-tier series. That setup clarifies trade-offs, helps buyers self-select based on priority, and often paves the way for natural upsells.

This isn’t just intuition, but there’s real psychology behind it. Multiple studies show that when presented with three pricing choices (low, middle, high), buyers overwhelmingly gravitate toward the middle option. According to behavioral science, the middle tier is perceived as the "Goldilocks" choice—too expensive may feel risky, too cheap may seem insufficient—so the middle feels just right.

Jeanne DeWitt Grosser (Stripe, ex-Google), in her First Round Review interview, notes that tiered or hybrid pricing models are effective because they align with how customer value scales—letting sellers meet buyers where they are, not force them into mismatched tiers.

With Qwilr, you can make this playbook tangible. Instead of a dense list, buyers see clean visual pricing cards for each tier. One tier can be marked as “recommended,” drawing the eye—yet options feel manageable, not overwhelming.

a tablet screen shows packages for $ 6.00 $ 8.00 and $ 12.00

Collapse complexity visually

Every bundle has fine print that buyers will eventually want to see. But putting it all upfront creates overload and slows momentum. Buyers make decisions in layers: first, they look for clarity, then they validate the details. Your sales proposals should match that flow.

Qwilr makes this simple with dynamic pricing and quote blocks. At first glance, buyers see a clean solution framed around outcomes. When they are ready, they can open specifics on features, SKUs, or terms. This reduces friction early while still building trust later.

Show ROI at the bundle level

As we mentioned earlier, line-item pricing invites cherry-picking and the potential for discounts. That is why the more effective move is to anchor buyers on the ROI of the package itself.

Behavioral research refers to this phenomenon as the anchoring effect, which is when buyers make decisions by comparing reference points. If the only anchor is a SKU list, they fixate on cuts. However, if you compare the bundle against two stronger anchors, the total cost of buying separately and the value it delivers together, the package appears efficient instead of inflated.

Qwilr’s quote block makes this framing simple. Instead of static SKU tables, reps can present bundles as a single investment with context: the separate costs, the package price, and the projected ROI. Buyers stop debating individual features and start seeing the bundle as the more intelligent business decision.

Make pricing interactive

In B2B sales, hybrid pricing is the new normal. Subscriptions, usage tiers, and custom add-ons often need to coexist. Static PDFs can’t show that complexity without confusing buyers. What wins deals is letting buyers see how pricing flexes to their needs in real time.

Qwilr’s interactive quote block is designed for precisely that. Dynamic pricing tables combine recurring charges with add-ons and tiers, allowing buyers to toggle options and see their totals update instantly. The result is clarity, not second-guessing.

Alex Dutton, Sales Director at Brisant Secure puts it this way:

“We can see that the click rate is really good – people are engaging with our proposals very quickly. And they’ll often repeatedly engage until they accept, tinkering with the pricing and the options that are on there.”


As you can see, when buyers can model scenarios themselves, pricing stops being a sticking point and starts becoming a reason to say yes.

a screenshot of a pricing page on a website .

Closing the clarity gap at scale

Most stalled bundle deals fail for the same reason: buyers can’t see the package as a whole. Instead of value, they see a list of parts. That’s where proposals either break the deal or unlock it, because the way you frame bundles is the way buyers perceive them.

Qwilr gives you that system in one place: outcome-led pages, collapsible detail, a quote block for bundle-level ROI, interactive pricing tied to your CRM, and engagement signals your reps can act on.

If your team is wrestling with how to present complex bundles more clearly, it might be time to see Qwilr in action. Book a demo and see how interactive proposals make the value story impossible to miss.




About the author

Taru Bhargava, Content Strategist & Marketer

Taru Bhargava|Content Strategist & Marketer

Taru is a content strategist and marketer with over 15 years of experience working with global startups, scale-ups, and agencies. Through taru&co., she combines her expert skills in content strategy, brand management, and SEO to drive more high-intent organic traffic for ambitious brands. When she’s not working, she’s busy raising two tiny dragons. She's on a first-name basis with Mindy Kaling.